Column: You cannot solve systemic problems with spreadsheets
In this column, Hans Stegeman, chief economist at Triodos Investment Management, writes why he believes that systemic risks have only increased.
By Hans Stegeman, Chief Economist, Triodos Investment Management
After the 2008 financial crisis, it was decided that this should not be allowed to ever happen again. An avalanche of research ensued; how economists could have got it so wrong? The lessons learned from the study of complex systems were applied to the financial sector.
This led to the unanimous conclusion that there are systemic risks, tipping points and dangerous feedback loops within the financial system that can suddenly cause a crash. But all the writing and all the talk did not produce much action. Admittedly, bank buffers were raised, more regulation introduced, and risk oversight became stricter, but the system itself remained as it was. Spreadsheets to manage single risks. Nice and orderly.
The events of recent weeks prove that systemic risks have not gone away. First, we had the shock in the US, where Silicon Valley once again demonstrated that technology can accelerate everything, including a bank run. And then Switzerland, where a problem that had been dragging on for years at an oversized bank culminated in a forced takeover, making systemic problems in the longer run even larger. The reason why these systemic problems did not erupt earlier is that they were covered by a veil of liquidity.
In fact, I believe that the systemic risks have only increased. In many countries, the big players have only become bigger. This applies to banks as well as to asset managers. In most countries, the concentration ratio in the banking sector increased, induced by technology that creates economies of scale for large money flows. Furthermore, the supervision, especially in the banking sector, has led to extensive monoculture: standardization and tighter regulations made control easier but diminished diversity. The negative feedback loops in the system are also making themselves felt more quickly.
This was demonstrated by the twitter bank run on Silicon Valley Bank, but we also see it in financial markets in general. Panic can spread faster, leading to a larger chance of crashes. Meanwhile, the financial sector is having to contend with a considerably higher level of debt than in 2008, around two and a half times global GDP, versus two times GDP then. Can you imagine? 15 years after a global debt crisis you end up with more debt?
Global debt monitor
You don’t fight complexity by leaving the system as is, believing that regulating it is enough. Even more so, you don’t fight complexity by adding complexity, so more regulation will not work. If you compare the financial sector with nature, as was done in an article back in 2008, you will quickly see why. You want to prevent one dominant species from developing, because that would make the system increasingly vulnerable due to monoculture and diminishing diversity and by putting an extreme burden on the system.
So you ensure diversity and try to reduce the dominance of a handful of species, in order to prevent the whole system from collapsing if one species or element is knocked out. And what you want to prevent most of all is problematic elements from holding the whole system hostage. We did not do any of this. Lobbying, forgetfulness and not enough guts. It won’t be any different this time. Everything is the same as it was before.
”Getting green technology companies through the growth phase is like sailing a ship through a perfect storm,” says Laurits Bach Sørensen, Senior Partner at Nordic Alpha Partners.
Investors and asset managers remain positive about the benefits of artificial intelligence – despite some concerns about geopolitics and their possible effects on tech giant Nvidia.
So far, Ridge Capital’s Nordic high yield strategy has exceeded the targeted return, founders and portfolio managers Måns Levin and Christoffer Malmström tell AMWatch.
KLP and the KLP funds are excluding the American machinery manufacturer due to the risk of contributing to violations of human rights and international law in the West Bank and Gaza.
Kyrkans Pension broke FSA rules when the pension fund made a major investment in real estate company Stelvalvet, the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority says.
Akademikerpension is divesting investments worth DKK 324m (EUR 43.4m) in 30 drilling companies. Until now, the pension fund had been unaware of the involvement of these companies in fossil expansion.
American Century’s Pia Michelsson tells AMWatch that impact investing in the Nordic region is ”next level” in this first article of our 2024 Summer Series featuring international asset managers.
The Head of Danske Bank Asset Management, Christian Heiberg, had expected more new mandates by now for its EMD strategy, which has shown world-class performance since a new team took over.
The owners of infrastructure fund manager AIP Management have sold the majority of their shares to Storebrand, one of Norway’s largest financial groups.
Northvolt, the Swedish manufacturer of sustainable batteries for electric vehicles, is facing a mountain of problems as the market for its products appears to be saturated.
So far, Ridge Capital’s Nordic high yield strategy has exceeded the targeted return, founders and portfolio managers Måns Levin and Christoffer Malmström tell AMWatch.
American Century’s Pia Michelsson tells AMWatch that impact investing in the Nordic region is ”next level” in this first article of our 2024 Summer Series featuring international asset managers.