PFA claims returns comparisons overlook risk
PFA's poor performance in returns comparisons is partially due to the fact that portfolio risk is not considered, the pension company claims. However, independent advisor Nikolaj Holdt Mikkelsen, who provides cross-industry comparisons, calls this argument "bullshit."
BY DORTHE BACH, TRANSLATED BY CATHERINE BRETT
Peter Tind Larsen, head of alternatives at PFA, claims that the alternative investments in the pension company's portfolio are of a good standard, and returns are reported based on the recommendations from industry association Forsikring & Pension.
Already a subscriber?Log in here
Read the whole article
Get access for 14 days for free. No credit card is needed, and you will not be automatically signed up for a paid subscription after the free trial.
With your free trial you get:
Get full access for you and your coworkers
Start a free company trial todayRelated articles
PFA risks losing EUR 430m from aviation investment
For subscribers
